The focus of my final graduate course, on ancient world literature, became the cyclical and intertextual nature of creation myths. One of the stories I ended up narrowing in on was the story of Kain and Able in the Hebrew Bible. That said, my favorite short piece in In Praise Of Darkness is Legend:
Cain and Abel came upon each other after Abel’s death. They were walking through the desert, and they recognized each other from afar, since both men were very tall. The two brothers sat on the ground, made a fire, and ate. They sat silently, as weary people do when dusk begins to fall. In the sky, a star glittered, though it had not yet been given a name. In the light of the fire, Cain saw that Abel’s forehead bore the mark of the stone, and he dropped the bread he was about to carry to his mouth, and asked his brother to forgive him.
“Was it you that killed me, or did I kill you ?” Abel answered. “I don’t remember any more; here we are, together, like before.”
“Now I know that you have truly forgiven me,” Cain said, “because forgetting is forgiving. I, too, will try to forget.”
“Yes, said Abel slowly. “So long as remorse lasts, guilt lasts” (12)
The changes in intertextual narrative direction in ancient literature, whether Sumerian’s Descent Of Inanna, or Greek’s Persephone myth in The Homeric Hymns, or otherwise, are a form of erasure each time the narrative is changed as oral myths were passed from civilization to civilization and adapted for them. This is particularly true for women in creation myths, which was the subject of my seminar paper. Women are liberated and powerful in some versions of the creation myth, in others they are docile and lack agency.
More on this when I get around to posting my seminar paper.
Related posts
- Authority & Linearity In Classical Literature (1)
- Weekly Reader (0)
- (0)
- Senior Thesis On Jorge Luis Borges & Intertextuality (0)
- Powers Of Horror: An Essay On Abjection (0)